RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the level of awareness regarding osteoarthritis and its management. METHODS: This study was cross-sectional, using data from a sample of 389 individuals from the central region of Saudi Arabia. The participants completed an online questionnaire and ensured anonymity. Results: A total of 389 participants made up the sample for this study, which had a predominance of females (56.6%, n=220), a majority aged <50 years (66.6%, n=259), and most of them (51.7%, n=201) weighing 60-80 kg, substantial proportion lived in the Riyadh region (27.5%, n=107), with more than half (59.4%, n=231) having a university education and working in offices (28.3%, n=110). The majority (73.3%, n=285) of participants were married, and a vast majority (87.9%, n=342) were not smokers. The findings revealed that only 32.9% (n=128) of the participants had good knowledge about osteoarthritis. The study found that stiffness (80.2%, n=312) and swelling (97.9%, n = 381) are the most common signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis; the risk factors for osteoarthritis were genetic factors (79.7%, n=310) and age (91.3%, n=355). The treatment of osteoarthritis identified in the study included exercises such as swimming (85.1%, n=331), physical therapy (86.6%, n=337), and joint replacement surgery (92.0%, n=358). The study established a statistically significant association between age, education level, previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis, family history of osteoarthritis (p = 0.004, 0.001, 0.002, and 0.001, respectively), and level of knowledge about osteoarthritis. However, there was no statistically significant association between gender, marital status, smoking status, previous knee injuries, physical activity level, and the level of knowledge about osteoarthritis (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, the study revealed that 32.9% (n=128) of the participants had good knowledge about osteoarthritis. Participants aged 50-60 years, those with a university and post-graduate level of education, as well as those who had a previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis and those with a family history of osteoarthritis, had greater and better knowledge and awareness about osteoarthritis. Joint stiffness and swelling were identified, as the most common signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis. The risk factors identified in the study were genetic factors and age, while the treatment options noted by the study were exercise, such as swimming, physical therapy, and joint replacement surgery. The study notes the need for enhanced public awareness of the problems associated with osteoarthritis among the Saudi Arabian population.
RESUMO
Objective: The goal of this study was to see if there was a link between individuals who had a sleeve gastrectomy and their knee discomfort, as well as what factors could influence knee pain after a sleeve gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: The general population of Saudi Arabia was studied in this cross-sectional survey, which took place from August 2021 to February 2022. Only people who had had a sleeve gastrectomy and were experiencing knee discomfort were included in the research. Results: The results revealed that bariatric surgery had improved knee pain status in most of the participants (76%) while (12.1%) complained that the pain worsened after the surgery. The results also showed that nearly half of our participants (49.8%) that complain of knee pain have lost more than 35 kg after bariatric surgery, which illustrates the impact of a number of kilograms (kg) lost after bariatric surgery. Only (12.8%) of the participants considered physiotherapy as an intervention for their knee pain. Also, the results showed that severe pain was considerably more prevalent in the older age group and those with concomitant chronic disease. Conclusions: Our data revealed that a small percentage of participants had worsening knee discomfort, which might be connected to inactivity following sleeve gastrectomy surgery. As a result, we urge that further clinical studies be conducted to learn more about the exacerbation of knee pain after a gastrectomy.
RESUMO
Objective This cross-sectional study aimed to identify and analyze misconceptions prevalent in Saudi Arabian society regarding intra-articular injections and their sources. It also sought to explore factors influencing patients' decision-making in the context of osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. Methods A sample of 405 adult participants from various educational backgrounds residing in Saudi Arabia completed a self-administered questionnaire. The survey focused on participants' knowledge about intra-articular injections, their sources of information, and their beliefs and perceptions related to these injections. Results The study unveiled a significant lack of awareness among the participants, with almost half (48.4%) reporting no knowledge of intra-articular injections. Of all, 16.1% held misconceptions about these injections, including believing that they are painful or they liquify the bone. Participants expressed varied thoughts on the effects of intra-articular injections, with 69.6% associating them with short-term pain relief. While 60.2% disagreed that intra-articular injections could provide long-term pain relief, 65.2% believed that these injections could delay the need for surgery. The source of knowledge varied, with 34.4% relying on orthopedics and 32.5% on friends and relatives. In those who had received intra-articular injections (n = 62), 83.9% cited the desire to delay or avoid surgery as a reason. While 56.5% were very satisfied with their doctor's guidance, 46.8% expressed concerns about relying on injections in the future. Furthermore, educational levels were correlated with knowledge, highlighting the need for more accessible and tailored patient education materials. However, even among those with a university education, misconceptions persisted. Effective patient-doctor communication was associated with secondary or university education (χ² = 11.05, p = 0.011). Conclusion The prevalence of misconceptions regarding intra-articular injections in Saudi Arabia underscores the need for comprehensive patient education and improved communication between healthcare providers and patients. Addressing these misconceptions is essential for empowering patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and enhancing the overall quality of care they receive. This study's findings have implications not only for Saudi Arabia but also for healthcare systems globally, emphasizing the significance of patient-centered care and informed decision-making.